A self-proclaimed commander of the Biafra Liberation Army, widely known as C-ROZ, has shared an in-depth account of his experience following the sentencing of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), to life imprisonment by the Federal High Court in Abuja. His narrative provides a detailed perspective on the mixed reactions across the southeastern region of Nigeria, shedding light on the ongoing tensions, emotions, and debates surrounding the court’s ruling.
On 20 November 2025, Justice James Omotosho delivered the landmark judgment, convicting Kanu on multiple terrorism-related charges. This ruling has since sparked a wide range of responses, from grief and anger to relief and celebration, reflecting the diverse opinions within the communities affected by IPOB’s activities and the subsequent court proceedings.
Observations from the Ground
C-ROZ recounted his movements across several towns and cities in the southeastern region, where he interacted with residents to gauge their reactions to the sentencing. He described the emotional complexity of the environment, noting that the responses were not uniform, with some individuals openly expressing joy while others appeared sorrowful or contemplative. “I removed my mask, as did three of my comrades. I was shocked to see some people rejoicing. I asked them what had happened and why they were celebrating,” he stated.
According to C-ROZ, the celebratory reactions were largely linked to the cessation of the sit-at-home orders previously imposed by IPOB. “Sir, are you the only one who doesn’t know that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has been convicted?” the people reportedly asked, highlighting the relief that some felt after a period of restrictions on daily activities. He expressed deep concern over these responses, emphasizing that the joy came at a time when many were not fully aware of the broader implications of Kanu’s conviction for the community and the movement he leads.
C-ROZ added that he sought to remind residents of the sacrifices and intentions of Nnamdi Kanu. “I felt deeply hurt. I asked them what they believed was the reason behind everything MNK is facing. They kept quiet. I reminded them that he went through all these things because he wanted to help our people,” he said. This reflection highlights the disconnect between public perception and the personal sacrifices made by IPOB leadership, according to C-ROZ’s account.
He further stressed that Kanu’s sentencing impacts not only the leader himself but also the wider community, urging citizens to focus on collective wellbeing rather than individual reactions. “Without life, none of those things matter,” he remarked, underscoring the fundamental importance of human life over political or ideological disputes. C-ROZ’s statement served as both a reflection and a cautionary note to the public, urging them to consider long-term implications rather than temporary relief or outrage.
Call for Calm and Perseverance
Despite the mixed emotions and tension surrounding the verdict, C-ROZ implored the public not to succumb to despair. He encouraged followers and residents to remain steadfast and patient as further legal and political developments unfold. “MNK will still find justice. It is only in Nigeria that a person can be convicted under a repealed law—one that no longer exists,” he observed, referencing the perceived irregularities in the legal process that led to Kanu’s sentencing.
He concluded his message by urging supporters to maintain courage, unity, and faith while awaiting the next steps. “I will continue my work, and in time, everyone will see what comes next. May God guide us all,” C-ROZ affirmed. His remarks underline a call for measured responses amid strong emotions, reflecting a leadership perspective that prioritizes patience, reflection, and perseverance over immediate reactions.
Overall, the statement from C-ROZ captures the complex spectrum of reactions in the southeastern region following Nnamdi Kanu’s life sentence. It provides insight into the contrasting emotions—ranging from relief over changes in day-to-day restrictions to deep concern over the judicial outcome—and highlights the need for continued dialogue, understanding, and vigilance within the affected communities. The account also emphasizes the ongoing debate regarding justice, governance, and civil engagement in the region, making it a crucial record of public sentiment during this critical moment.
